The Tyranny of the DEI Bureaucracy

WSJ

The Editorial Board condemns university DEI offices as authoritarian, ideological enforcement bureaus. “The Stanford blowup shows how the culture of DEI, and especially its accumulation of power in the bureaucracy, has become a threat to free speech… Rather than promoting diversity, DEI officers enforce ideological conformity.”

DEI offices, the board explains, “exercise a broad writ on campus and act as speech police within the university… That power was on ugly display last week at Stanford Law School, where a mob of law students shouted down Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Kyle Duncan in a spectacle unfit for any institution of higher learning…”

“Heckling unpopular speakers is common on campus, but what makes this episode stand out is the role played by administrators.” The piece goes on to detail the role of Stanford Law School’s associate dean for DEI, Tirien Steinbach, who repeatedly asked, “Is the juice worth the squeeze,” i.e. is free speech worth the “harm” it causes.

“The tyranny of DEI has spread across far too many American institutions. The DEI movement may have started with good intentions, but across government, education and American business its functionaries have too often become ideological enforcers,” writes the Board.

Will these officers ever achive their goals? Far from it. “DEI officials have a vested interest in ensuring that the grievances of identity politics continue lest the offices have no reason to exist. As the Stanford experience shows, they promote racial division rather than redress it, and institutions need to rethink their value.”

Read the Article

Related:

Previous
Previous

My Struggle Session at Stanford Law School

Next
Next

Woke word-policing is now beyond satire